Quoting someone who has committed mass murder to give his views a platform they would otherwise not have - I already feel I am on dodgy ground. However the purpose of Anders Breivik's actions has been a warped defence of a way of life he labels cultural Christianity. His reasoning may be far from normal but his notion of cultural Christianity is so mainstream that it does merit some exploration. What he affirms is that there is such a thing as a Christianity which does not require a personal attachment to the founder Jesus Christ. You can find Breivik's quotation here. Now quite aside from the inconsistency of using violence instead of the democratic process. Or targeting those who bore absolutely no responsibility for the actions of the multiculturalists he despises. The idea that Christianity is a civilisation which ought to be defended and protected against foreign incursion. Whatever might be the intentions of the person who started it. Well this seems bonkers to me but sounds to me like something which an awful lot of people in British society would agree with.
Actually I would argue the opposite view. Which is that a personal attachment to the person and teaching of Jesus Christ is a lot more life changing than trying to preserve residues of Christian culture even if it has in 2 millenia transformed the planet
The problem with cultural Christianity is that it naively assumes that Christianity is European. And white. Which it isn't. Its a Middle Eastern faith and despite the troubles of the last half century when Christians have been emptying out of the Middle East in droves it remains a Middle Eastern faith. More powerfully faith in Christ has crossed culture after culture much to the disapproval of the culture brigade who regard this as imperialistic. The missionaries were devoted but they weren't that good. The global Christianity which is spreading even now is a testament to the ability of the Christian faith to become embedded in the cultures which absorb it. Christian culture in Brazil looks a lot different to Christian culture in Sri Lanka.
Secularism is an attractive idea. I can go and eat in the local curry house without troubling myself with sharing the values of the chef. As long as he subscribes to health and safety that is.. But Christianity isn't a curry. Its a way of life built around the life of the God man. And naive as that sounds you can't have one without the other. Plenty of people have picked up weapons in the name of Christ and have done appalling things. Intriguingly Breivik didn't kill teenagers in the name of Christ but in the name of white cultural Christianity. Mark that a fail..
Here's a commentary from the same blogger on Breivik's logic